THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE OFFICIALLY DEFINED: ROGUE STATE IN THE FORM OF ETHNO-NATIONALIST, NAZIST, WHITE SUPREMATIST, GENOCIDAL TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP. The UNITED STATES Government Has Been Acting Unlawfully In violation of Constitutional Civil Rights And International Law Treaties, not fulfilling its obligations to the Principles Of Article 3 Stated In The NATO TREATY OBLIGATIONS. The Direct Threats of annexation of Greenland are a clear and heinous violation of NATO Treaties and a direct threat to Europe.
The North Atlantic Treaty, NATO Article 3 Violations
Article 3 of the NATO Treaty states that parties will “maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack” and commits members to strengthening “free institutions” and promoting “conditions of stability and well-being.” While not explicitly defining these terms, the treaty’s preamble references “the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law.”
U.S. Violations of Democratic Standards
Illegal Suspension of habeas corpus contradicts fundamental rule of law, Military deployment against civilians undermines civil-military separation essential to democratic governance, Systematic human rights abuses violate “individual liberty” commitments, Judicial independence attacks (discussed below) undermine “free institutions”, Constitutional breakdown represents failure to maintain democratic governance.
DIRECT THREAT TO EUROPE AND THE NATO ALLIANCE
Military Threats Against Greenland (Denmark)
The United States has issued unprecedented threats of military aggression against Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark and therefore covered under NATO’s Article 5 collective defence provision. Threats: Trump stated the U.S. is “going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not” Trump threatened to do it “the hard way” if a deal cannot be reached. The White House released a statement declaring, “Utilising the U.S. military is always an option at the commander-in-chief’s disposal”.
The Democratic Governance Requirement
NATO membership has historically required adherence to democratic principles, though enforcement mechanisms remain limited. The alliance operates on the assumption that member states maintain basic democratic institutions and respect for human rights, including due process protections like habeas corpus.
Documented Concerns During the Trump Administration
First Trump Administration (2017-2021)
Family Separation Policy The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy separated over 5,000 children from their parents, with no tracking process or records that would allow them to be reunited. Long before the Trump administration implemented its “zero tolerance” immigration enforcement policy in 2018, it was already separating children from their parents as part of a “pilot program” conducted in the El Paso, Texas, area and along other parts of the border.
- As many as 1,360 children have never been reunited with their parents six years after the United States government forcibly separated them at the US border
- Systematic separation without adequate judicial oversight or reunification procedures
- The United Nations’ human rights office denounced the US practice of separating children from their migrant and asylum seeker parents at the US border
Border Detention Conditions
- Prolonged detentions in facilities with inadequate conditions
- Barriers to legal representation and court access
- Cases of U.S. citizens wrongfully detained during immigration sweeps
Current Trump Administration (2025)
Proposed Habeas Corpus Suspension Legal experts and Democrats expressed growing alarm over the weekend that Trump administration officials are openly discussing unilaterally suspending habeas corpus — a bedrock American legal right — without the approval of Congress. Miller’s use of the word “invasion” reflects the Trump administration’s argument that constitutional provisions allow suspension during cases of invasion.
- The move to expel migrants would curtail a constitutional right to due process
- Discussions of bypassing judicial review for deportation proceedings
- Constitutional experts argue this exceeds executive authority, as “The Constitution makes clear that suspension of habeas corpus is to be reserved for actual rebellion or invasion posing the most dire threats to public safety”
Constitutional Violations
Habeas Corpus Discussions: Trump administration officials are openly discussing unilaterally suspending habeas corpus without Congressional approval, despite constitutional requirements that only Congress may suspend this right during rebellion or invasion WikipediaDue Process Denial: Federal judges ruled CECOT deportations violated due process, as people were sent “with virtually no notice and no opportunity to contest the bases of their removal” ABC NewsMilitary Law Violations: Federal courts ruled the administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act by using military for civilian law enforcement, with the Supreme Court blocking National Guard deployment WikipediaCNN
ICE as Paramilitary Force (Gestapo Parallel)
Nine shootings by ICE agents since September 2025, with four people killed during deportation operations. Wikipedia 32 people died in ICE custody in 2025, marking the deadliest year in ICE’s history in over two decades. Orlando Weekly: Warrantless arrests, political targeting of activists, and refusal to identify agents during operations. The transformation of Immigration and Customs Enforcement into a militarised political police force represents a fundamental threat to democratic governance.
Operational Characteristics:
- Warrantless arrests and detentions
- Refusal to identify agents during operations
- Targeting of political activists and dissidents
- Racial profiling of Latino communities
- Deployment with military support
- Extra-legal violence with impunity
While comparisons to Nazi Germany seem hyperbolic of a past time, the structural parallels between ICE’s current operations and the Gestapo’s early functions are evident: Integration with armed forces despite legal prohibitions, operating outside normal judicial constraints ( JD Vance claimed “absolute immunity”, non-accountability for any crime, civil and human rights violations). Documented cases of arrests based on activism rather than immigration violations, with the deliberate use of paramilitary terror tactics Creating climate of fear in targeted communities, Minimal accountability for violence and rights violations.
Crimes Against Humanity: Enforced Disappearances and Arbitrary Detention, CECOT Deportations
In March 2025, the Trump administration deported over 280 migrants to El Salvador’s CECOT maximum-security prison under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act Federal courts ruled these deportations violated due process, as individuals were removed “with virtually no notice and no opportunity to contest the bases of their removal” Human Rights Watch and Cristosal documented that these deportations constitute “arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance under international human rights law” Deportees have been subjected to torture, beatings, and sexual abuse at CECOT Government data revealed only 32 of 238 Venezuelan deportees had been convicted of crimes in the United States, contradicting administration claims they were “terrorists” and “the worst of the worst” The U.S. paid El Salvador $6 million to house migrants at CECOT, a facility documented to hold 65-70 people per cell with severe human rights abuses.
Evidence and Documentation
The documented violations include: Systematic Family Separation (2017-2021): Over 5,000 children were separated from their parents with no records that would enable parents and children to be reunited, constituting a breach of due process protections. The United Nations’ human rights office denounced the US practice of separating children from their migrant and asylum seeker parents at the US border. As many as 1,360 children have never been reunited with their parents six years after the United States government forcibly separated them at the US border.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Article 9 of the UDHR prohibits “arbitrary arrest, detention or exile,” while Article 8 guarantees the right to effective legal remedies. Systematic habeas corpus violations could constitute breaches of international human rights law.
ICE Violence and Criminality, Killings and Excessive Force
Nine shootings by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents since September 2025. Four people were killed during deportation operations 32 people died in ICE custody in 2025, marking the deadliest year in ICE’s history in over two decades. ICE wrongfully arrested and detained 1,480 U.S. citizens due to database errors and lax investigations. Mark Daniel Lyttle, a U.S. citizen with mental disabilities, was wrongfully deported to Mexico and spent 125 days in Central America without identification or resources.
Military Deployment Against Civilians
The Trump administration deployed National Guard troops to multiple cities, with up to 1,700 troops mobilizing across 19 states to support ICE operations Federal courts, including Judge Charles Breyer, ruled the administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act by using military for civilian law enforcement The Supreme Court blocked National Guard deployment to Chicago, ruling the administration “failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois”. The ACLU has warned that the administration is “trying to build out a sprawling national military and police force—intended to be accountable to the president, not the people” This represents a fundamental shift from civilian law enforcement to military-style occupation of domestic territory.
NATO’s Response Mechanisms
Article 13: Withdrawal Provisions
NATO’s founding treaty includes withdrawal mechanisms but lacks explicit expulsion procedures. Article 13 allows members to cease participation after 20 years with one year’s notice.
EVIDENCE OF UNITED STATES ONGOING CRIMES AND ILLEGALITIES
Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident and Columbia University student, was arrested by ICE agents without a warrant. The agents refused to identify themselves and did not present legal documentation during the arrest. Khalil was detained in a remote facility, and his lawyers argue the arrest was politically motivated due to his pro-Palestinian activism. Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian activist, was detained by ICE immediately after a scheduled citizenship interview. His attorney stated the detention was solely based on his Palestinian identity and activism, calling it unconstitutional.
Detentions of U.S. Citizens
Between 2012 and 2018, ICE wrongfully arrested and detained 1,480 U.S. citizens due to errors in databases and lax investigations. Some individuals were detained for extended periods, with one man held for over three years. Mark Daniel Lyttle, a U.S. citizen with mental disabilities, was wrongfully deported to Mexico and spent 125 days in Central America without identification or resources. His case highlighted systemic issues in ICE’s reliance on flawed data and lack of due process.
Violations of Due Process and Legal Rights
In 2006, ICE conducted raids on Swift & Co. meatpacking plants, arresting 1,297 workers. Many detainees lacked access to legal counsel, were moved across state lines, and were pressured into signing voluntary deportation agreements without understanding their rights. The ACLU reported that ICE continued to detain hundreds of Iraqi nationals, including Christians and other minorities, despite court orders halting deportations due to the risk of persecution upon return.
Targeting of Ethnic Minorities and Political Opponents, Racial Profiling and Discrimination
ICE has been criticised for racial profiling, particularly targeting Latino communities. In Pennsylvania, ICE officers conducted raids without warrants, focusing solely on Latino workers, which an immigration judge deemed an “egregious” constitutional violation. Programs like 287(g) have been linked to increased arrests of Latino individuals for minor infractions, leading to concerns about discriminatory policing practices.
Persecution of Political Activists
The Trump administration’s immigration crackdown included detaining and deporting individuals involved in pro-Palestinian protests and foreign-born academics. These actions were often justified under dubious legal grounds, raising alarms about the suppression of dissent. Mahmoud Khalil and Mohsen Mahdawi‘s cases exemplify the targeting of political activists under the guise of immigration enforcement, with both individuals facing detention due to their activism.
ECONOMIC WARFARE AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM DESTABILIZATION
The United States is implementing policies that systematically undermine the dollar’s role as global reserve currency while creating parallel financial infrastructure designed to precipitate a banking crisis. Current Dollar Decline, The dollar dropped 11% in the first half of 2025, the biggest decline for a first half of the year since 1973, Morgan Stanley Research estimates the U.S. currency could lose another 10% by the end of 2026, After Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were announced, the dollar declined sharply even as financial volatility soared, breaking the normal “flight-to-safety” pattern where the dollar rises during crises. Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff stated: “Donald Trump is a catalyst” for dollar weakness and warned “we have not seen anything like this since 1971, when Nixon took us off gold”, Markets are increasingly nervous about U.S. policy credibility, with rising term premiums demanded by investors to own U.S. Treasuries, Trump’s economic policies threaten factors that have supported the dollar’s stature, including “the prudence and predictability of US policies; the safety and depth of US capital markets; the rule of law and investor protections”. Economic Headwinds: Private investment fell nearly 15% after Trump announced Liberation Day tariffs, This represents the biggest one-quarter decline outside a recession since 1988. Fiscal Deterioration:The U.S. budget deficit grew to around $1.8 trillion for fiscal year 2024,This is the third-largest federal deficit in U.S. history, equal to 6.4% of GDP.
The “GENIUS” Act: Creating a Parallel Currency System
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) creates infrastructure for a parallel dollar-denominated payment system that bypasses Federal Reserve control and threatens banking system stability.
Regulatory Framework: Requires 100% reserve backing with liquid assets like U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries, Issuers must make monthly public disclosures of reserve composition, Stablecoins are explicitly NOT securities or commodities. Banks, credit unions, and nonbank institutions can issue crypto-stablecoins, All stablecoin issuers must possess the technical capability to seize, freeze, or burn payment stablecoins when legally required.
The Banking Crisis Mechanism
Deposit Flight: Bank depositors convert deposits to stablecoins while maintaining dollar denomination, No currency risk, no foreign exchange exposure, Higher potential returns than bank deposits, Greater portability and lower transaction costs. Banking System Disintermediation: Money exits the fractional reserve banking system, Banks lose deposit base, their fundamental funding source, Credit creation capacity collapses, Banks forced to sell assets to meet redemptions.
Federal Reserve Dollar System Potential Collapse
Monetary policy transmission breaks down when money lives outside the banking system, Interest rate adjustments lose effectiveness, the Federal Reserve cannot conduct traditional open market operations,Central bank control of money supply evaporates. Systemic Crisis: Bank failures accelerate deposit flight, Credit markets freeze, Economic contraction intensifies deposit flight, Systemic crisis spiral and economic collapse.
Why This Is Deliberate
The GENIUS Act creates precisely the infrastructure necessary for catastrophic banking disintermediation. Unlike previous fintech innovations, stablecoins combine: Dollar denomination (no currency risk for holders), Regulatory arbitrage (not securities, not deposits), Banking system participation (legitimacy and scale), Seizure capabilities (government control when needed). This structure creates a government-approved exit mechanism from traditional banking while maintaining government control over the alternative system.
The Nazi Germany Parallel: MEFO Bills similarities with CryptoCurrencies and “StableCoins”
The historical precedent for creating an alternative financial system to bypass monetary controls while financing aggressive state expansion is Nazi Germany’s MEFO bills system. MEFO Structure: MEFO bills were promissory notes drawn upon the Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft, a dummy company, devised by Hjalmar Schacht in 1934 to finance rearmament. Between 1934 and 1938, MEFO bills worth 12 billion Reichsmark were issued; Germany’s entire national debt in 1932 was only 10 billion Reichsmark.
Key Characteristics: MEFO bills were not Reichsmarks and did not appear in the federal budget, The system helped conceal the extent of rearmament spending, Created “a large amount of reichsmarks off the books, inflating the currency in secret”, Amounts were considered state secrets, The system “tripled Germany’s national debt in just six years, but more than half of the increase was off the books”.
The Collapse: When MEFO notes fell due in 1938, the government discovered a serious cash shortage. Hitler faced the option of “shifting the German economy to export goods to pay the bills or going to war and paying the debts off from looting profits extracted from conquered states”, the United States has already aligned with Russia to exploit and plunder Ukraine, and has recently announced the illegal exploitation and plunder of Venezuela Oil resources, meanwhile threatening another NATO country, Denmark, to plunder Greenland resources. This pattern of Trump Criminal Rogue American administration proves how the United States follows the path of Nazi Germany Reich.
Structural Parallels with Alternative Currency System: Nazi Germany: MEFO bills bypass normal Reichsmark monetary controls, United States: Stablecoins bypass Federal Reserve monetary controls, Off-Balance-Sheet Financing: Nazi Germany: MEFO concealed the true extent of government spending and debt, United States: Stablecoins move money outside traditional banking system metrics.
State Control with Private Facade: Nazi Germany: MEFO operated through a dummy private company, United States: Stablecoins issued by private entities but with government seizure capabilities. Financing Aggressive Expansion: Nazi Germany: MEFO financed rearmament and territorial expansion, United States: Stablecoin system emerges simultaneously with Venezuela intervention and Greenland threats.
Inevitable Crisis: Nazi Germany: MEFO debts came due, forcing a choice between economic normalisation or war, United States: Stablecoin-induced banking crisis will force similar choice between policy reversal or escalating aggression.
Attack on Federal Reserve Independence
The criminal investigation of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell represents a direct assault on central bank independence, a fundamental pillar of dollar credibility. Federal prosecutors are conducting a criminal investigation of Powell, The Department of Justice has served grand jury subpoenas threatening criminal indictment. The investigation targets Powell’s interest rate decisions.
Powell’s Response: Powell stated: “The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President”. This represents unprecedented political interference in monetary policy. Why Fed Independence is Crucial: Foundation of the dollar’s role as global reserve currency, Central bank independence prevents inflation through political money printing, Credibility that monetary policy serves economic stability, not political expediency
Why Trump’s United States Is Extremely Dangerous and a Threat to All of Humanity
The United States presents a categorically different threat than historical rogue states because it operates as an insider threat within the international system it created. Characteristics of Insider Threat: U.S. controls NATO command structures, SWIFT payment system, dollar reserve currency, UN Security Council veto. Legitimacy: Actions cloaked in totalitarian dictatorship. Intelligence Access: U.S. has access to allied intelligence and communications. Why This Is More Dangerous: External rogue states can be contained through alliances. Insider rogue states destroy the containment architecture itself, No existing mechanism for restraining a rogue superpower that controls the primary alliance. This creates a global power vacuum with no clear successor architecture and Global Order Collapse.
READ MORE EVIDENCE:
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
ICE Continues to Detain Hundreds of Iraqis Despite Court Orders
https://www.aclu.org/news/immigrants-rights/ice-continues-detain-hundreds-iraqis-despite
Human Rights Watch
US: Treatment of Immigrant Children Violates Rights
https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/06/20/us-treatment-immigrant-children-violates-rights
Niskanen Center
Mistaken Detainment, Racial Profiling, and Discrimination: How ICE Fails to Protect Communities
https://www.niskanencenter.org/mistaken-detainment-racial-profiling-and-discrimination-how-ice-fails-to-protect-communities
The Guardian
Trump Officials Are Quietly Deporting Political Dissidents, Lawyers Say
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/28/trump-immigration-people-detained-deported-cases
Columbia Political Review
Immigration Detention…For US Citizens?
https://www.cpreview.org/articles/2019/2/immigration-detentionfor-us-citizens-gd5nd
National Public Radio (NPR)
ICE Held US Citizen for Nearly a Month
https://www.npr.org/2019/08/29/ice-held-u-s-citizen-for-weeks
Case Law and Legal Findings
Lyttle v. United States (2011)
Wrongful deportation of a mentally disabled U.S. citizen to Central America.
Case summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyttle_v._United_States
Swift Raids (2006)
Mass ICE raids at meatpacking plants; lack of legal representation for detainees.
Summary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_raids
Human Rights and Legal Commentary
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Statement on child separation at the U.S. border:
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2018/06/child-separation-united-states-migrant-children-should-not-be-treated
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General Reports
Reviews of detention centre conditions, rights violations, and procedural failings
https://www.oig.dhs.gov