Osint Report // For Public Awareness

This report provides a summary of far-right, ultranationalist, neo-fascist, and neo-Nazi groups across the United States and Europe. Many of these entities believe openly anti-democratic, subversive of Democratic Institutions, Xenophobic, and ethnically supremacist ideologies, with some showing paramilitary structures, transnational coordination, and explicit calls for violence against minorities, democratic institutions, and perceived “enemies”

While not all groups are legally designated as terrorist organizations, several display behavioral and structural characteristics consistent with early-stage domestic terrorism cells or subversive networks. These include the use of militaristic symbolism, recruitment via online radicalization, and involvement in hate crimes and political violence.

Findings and Evidence:

Common Traits Across Groups: Advocacy for ethnic purity or national rebirth: Promotion of exclusionary nationalism based on racial or ethnic supremacy. Rejection of liberal democratic norms and pluralism: Active opposition to multi-party democracy, rule of law, and constitutional governance. Dissemination of antisemitic, anti-Muslim, anti-LGBTQ+, and xenophobia. Systematic dehumanization campaigns targeting vulnerable populations. Glorification of authoritarian leaders and fascist history (e.g., Hitler, Mussolini, Codreanu) – Historical revisionism and valorization of totalitarian models Participation in violent demonstrations and/or connections to hate crimes: Direct engagement in political violence and intimidation tactics.

Systematic Targeting of Democratic Institutions

Media delegitimization – Coordinated attacks on press freedom and independent journalism as “fake news” to create information vacuums filled with extremist propaganda

Ostracism and attacks against trade unions: Deliberate undermining of organized labor as a democratic counterbalance to extremist movements. Far-right groups recognize trade unions as fundamental pillars of democratic society and target them through disinformation campaigns, workplace intimidation, and political pressure.

Hostility toward universities and critical thinking: Coordinated campaigns against academic freedom, intellectual inquiry, and evidence-based discourse. This includes attempts to eliminate diversity programs, restrict curriculum content, and undermine institutional autonomy.

Ethnic and political hatred of opposing political organizations: Systematic demonization of mainstream political parties, civil rights organizations, and democratic opposition groups as “enemies of the people”.

Judicial intimidation and election subversion: Threats against election officials, judges, and democratic processes, including bomb threats against state capitols and systematic harassment of public servants.

High-Risk Organizations

Poland: National-Radical Camp (ONR), National Revival of Poland (NOP) Hungary: Mi Hazánk Mozgalom (Our Homeland Movement), remnants of Jobbik’s extremist wing Italy: CasaPound, Forza Nuova Spain: Hogar Social Madrid, emerging cell “Deport Them Now Europe (DTN)” France: Génération Identitaire (banned), Civitas, C9M Germany: Der Dritte Weg, Junge Nationalisten, NPD Austria: Identitäre Bewegung Österreich (IBÖ), Die Heimat Romania: Noua Dreaptă, AUR (elements) Slovakia: ĽSNS, Republika United States: CPAC, Proud Boys, Patriot Front, National Socialist Movement, Atomwaffen Division.

United States Far-Right Nationalist and Neo-Nazi Organizations:

Patriot Front Founded: 2017, as a splinter from Vanguard America.

Ideology: White nationalism, neo-fascism. Activities: Known for widespread propaganda distribution and public demonstrations.

National Socialist Movement (NSM)

Founded: 1974. Ideology: Neo-Nazism, white supremacy. Activities: Once one of the largest neo-Nazi groups in the U.S., involved in rallies and public events.

Aryan Freedom Network (AFN)

Founded: 2018, Ideology: Neo-Nazism, racial separatism. Activities: Organizes events promoting white supremacy, including armed training sessions

Nationalist Social Club-131 (NSC-131)

Founded: 2019. Ideology: Neo-Nazism, anti-communism. Activities: Engages in public demonstrations, often targeting minority communities.

League of the South

Founded:1994. Ideology: Neo-Confederate, white supremacist. Activities: Advocates for Southern secession and a white-dominated society.

Asatru Folk Assembly (AFA)

Founded: 1994. Ideology: White nationalist interpretation of Norse paganism. Activities: Promotes a “folkish” belief system, emphasizing racial purity.

American Nazi Party

Founded: 1959. Ideology: Neo-Nazism. Activities: Engages in propaganda dissemination and public demonstrations.

Blood Tribe

Ideology: Neo-Nazism. Activities: Known for public demonstrations and dissemination of white supremacist materials.

The Daily Stormer

Founded: 2013. Ideology: Neo-Nazism, white supremacy. Activities: Operates an online platform promoting hate speech and extremist ideologies.

National Alliance

Founded: 1974. Ideology: White nationalism. Activities: Disseminates white supremacist propaganda and literature.

CPAC as Central Coordination Hub for Global Far-Right Networks

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) has evolved into a primary coordinating mechanism for international far-right extremist movements, functioning as what intelligence analysts increasingly recognize as a central hub for transnational anti-democratic coordination:

Global Network Expansion: CPAC has systematically expanded beyond its American origins to establish permanent operations across multiple continents, with regular conferences in Hungary, Australia, Japan, and Brazil, creating a formalized international infrastructure for far-right coordination.

Authoritarian Leadership Platform: The organization provides prominent platforms for authoritarian leaders, most notably Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who has used CPAC events to articulate what analysts term “the far-right international” strategy, a coordinated global movement to dismantle liberal democratic institutions.

Institutional Legitimization: By hosting figures like Orbán (described by democracy monitors as running a “dictatorship”), CPAC legitimizes authoritarian governance models and provides them with access to American conservative networks and funding mechanisms.

CPAC serves multiple coordinating functions including:

Cross-border ideological alignment through shared speaking platforms, Resource and strategy sharing between international far-right movements, Legitimization of anti-democratic policies through “conservative” branding, Creation of formal diplomatic channels between authoritarian movements, Coordination of messaging against international law and democratic institutions.

Anti-International Law Coordination: CPAC events consistently feature coordinated messaging against international bodies, with speakers regularly denouncing the WHO, UN, and other multilateral institutions as threats to “national sovereignty,” effectively serving as a planning forum for systematic international law rejection.

International Political Network and Associated Organizations:

CPAC has created direct operational links with major far-right political parties across Europe and globally, with documented speaker participation from:

European Political Parties and Leaders:

• Hungary: Fidesz (Viktor Orbán) – founding member of Patriots for Europe alliance
• Austria: Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) – Herbert Kickl, who calls himself “Volkskanzler” (People’s Chancellor), a Nazi-originated term
• Spain: VOX (Santiago Abascal) – described as far-right with 52 parliamentary seats
• Germany: Alternative for Germany (AfD) – Co-Chairwoman participation, classified as extremist by German intelligence
• France: National Rally (Marine Le Pen) – through Patriots for Europe coordination
• Italy: Northern League/Lega (Matteo Salvini) – Patriots for Europe member
• Slovakia: Direction-Social Democracy and other nationalist parties
• Czech Republic: ANO (Andrej Babiš) – former Prime Minister participation
• North Macedonia: Nationalist party leadership participation

Global Extensions:

• Argentina: Javier Milei (President)
• Brazil: Bolsonaro network affiliates
• Australia: Conservative party networks
• Japan: Nationalist political movements

The Patriots for Europe Alliance – CPAC’s Operational Arm:

Most significantly, CPAC has served as the coordination platform for the creation of the “Patriots for Europe” alliance, which became the third-largest group in the European Parliament. This alliance includes:

• Hungarian Fidesz
• French National Rally
• Austrian FPÖ
• Spanish VOX
• Italian Lega
• Dutch Party for Freedom
• Portuguese Chega
• Czech ANO

Front Organizations for Systematic Fascistization:

These political parties and their CPAC coordination represent only the visible, democratically-legitimized front for a broader systematic fascistization of European and global society. Intelligence analysis reveals this network operates on multiple levels: Electoral Front: Mainstream political parties provide democratic legitimacy while gradually normalizing authoritarian discourse, anti-immigrant policies, and rejection of international law. Propaganda Front: Covert Coordinated campaigns of mass-media propaganda to reshape social norms around nationalism, ethno-nationalism, traditional values, and rejection of pluralism, rejection of globalisation and international institutions, use of jargon as “global elites” echoing the anti-semitism conspiracy, using these parties’ platforms to mainstream previously fringe ideologies into empty political entities.

Institutional Front: Systematic capture of democratic institutions through electoral means, followed by gradual dismantling of checks and balances, press freedom, and civil societym as demonstrated in Hungary, Italy and Poland. International Front: Coordinated undermining of EU institutions, NATO solidarity, and international legal frameworks through synchronized political messaging and policy coordination. Paramilitary Undercurrent: While these political leaders maintain democratic facades, intelligence indicates coordination with and tolerance of more extreme paramilitary groups, vigilante organizations, and violent extremist cells that provide street-level intimidation and the implicit threat of violence.

Operational Significance: Intelligence assessments indicate CPAC’s role extends beyond ideological coordination to include practical coordination of political strategies, with documented evidence of shared campaign tactics, messaging coordination, and resource allocation across national boundaries. The organization’s chairman has explicitly stated intentions for continued global expansion, suggesting a systematic effort to create worldwide infrastructure for far-right coordination that extends far beyond electoral politics into comprehensive societal transformation

Transnational Threat Networks

Several groups maintain international networks via conferences, encrypted chat platforms, and cultural exchanges: Shared iconography (e.g., Black Sun, SS runes, Celtic cross) and rhetoric point to ideological convergence across national boundaries, Some groups are involved in coordinated disinformation campaigns and online radicalization strategies modeled on jihadist recruitment playbooks, Cross-border training and resource sharing: Exchange of tactical knowledge, funding mechanisms, and operational security practices.

Systematic Assault and Destabilzation of International Legal Order

International Humanitarian Law Rejection: Systematic campaigns against Geneva Conventions and Laws of Armed Conflict, often coupled with glorification of war crimes and ethnic cleansing as “necessary” actions, Delegitimization of Nuremberg Principles: Active denial of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide as legally binding concepts, often accompanied by Holocaust denial or minimization.

United Nations System Rejection : Coordinated campaigns portraying the UN as a “globalist conspiracy” undermining national sovereignty, with particular hostility toward peacekeeping operations and human rights monitoring, Rome Statute Opposition: Systematic rejection of the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction and universal principles of international criminal law, framing accountability mechanisms as foreign interference, Human Rights Framework Subversion: Deliberate misrepresentation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related treaties as threats to “traditional values” and national identity, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Hostility : Coordinated efforts to withdraw from or undermine ECHR mechanisms, particularly targeting refugee protections, anti-discrimination provisions, and democratic safeguards.

Subversion Mechanisms,Institutional Capture Strategy

Far-right extremists employ a multi-pronged approach to subvert democratic institutions:

Electoral Infiltration: Attempts to gain positions within mainstream political parties or create parallel political structures to influence policy from within the system.

Legal System Manipulation: Strategic litigation, judge shopping, and attempts to place sympathetic individuals in key judicial positions to undermine rule of law.

Administrative State Targeting: Systematic efforts to weaken regulatory agencies, civil service protections, and government oversight mechanisms through personnel changes and budget cuts.

International Legal Order Destabilization

Far-right extremist organizations actively seek to destabilize and delegitimize the foundational architecture of post-WWII international law:

Nuremberg Legacy Rejection: These groups systematically reject the legal precedents established by the Nuremberg Trials, including the concepts of crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. This rejection often manifests through Holocaust denial, historical revisionism, and the portrayal of Nazi war criminals as “patriots” or “victims” of Allied persecution.

UN System Delegitimization: Coordinated propaganda campaigns frame the United Nations as an illegitimate “world government” conspiracy designed to undermine national sovereignty. Groups specifically target UN human rights mechanisms, peacekeeping operations, and refugee protection frameworks as threats to “national purity.”

Rome Statute Opposition: Systematic rejection of the International Criminal Court and universal jurisdiction principles, with groups advocating for withdrawal from international criminal law treaties and portraying accountability mechanisms as “foreign judicial tyranny.”

Human Rights Framework Subversion: Deliberate distortion of international human rights law, portraying universal human rights as attacks on “traditional values,” national identity, and cultural sovereignty. Groups specifically target anti-discrimination principles and minority protection mechanisms.

ECHR Hostility: Organized campaigns to withdraw from or undermine the European Convention on Human Rights, particularly targeting provisions protecting refugees, minorities, and democratic institutions. Groups frame ECHR rulings as “foreign interference” in national judicial systems.

International Humanitarian Law Rejection: Systematic campaigns against the Geneva Conventions and Laws of Armed Conflict, often coupled with glorification of ethnic cleansing, war crimes, and genocide as legitimate tools of “national defense” or “ethnic preservation.”

Civil Society Destruction

Trade Union Suppression: Recognition that organized labor serves as a crucial democratic institution, extremist groups actively work to weaken collective bargaining rights, spread anti-union propaganda, and intimidate labor organizers.

Academic Freedom Erosion: Coordinated campaigns against universities include defunding threats, curriculum restrictions, faculty intimidation, and the dismantling of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

Media Ecosystem Manipulation: Creation of alternative information networks to bypass traditional fact-checking mechanisms while simultaneously undermining trust in independent journalism.

Escalating Threat Indicators

Violence and Intimidation

Recent intelligence indicates sustained patterns of extremist violence, with particular concentration in the United States. Monthly incident reports show consistent targeting of government officials, minority communities, and democratic institutions through threats, harassment, and physical violence.

Operational Sophistication

Groups are demonstrating increased tactical sophistication through: Encrypted communications for operational security. Decentralized cell structures to avoid law enforcement detection. Professional propaganda production rivaling state-level information operations International coordination for resource sharing and strategic planning.

United Kingdom

Patriotic Alternative (PA)

Activities: Organizes demonstrations and disseminates propaganda promoting white nationalist ideologies. Wikipedia+1The Guardian+1. Founded: 2019.Leader: Mark CollettIdeology: British fascism, neo-Nazism, white nationalism.

Britain First

Activities: Conducts street protests and online campaigns targeting Muslim communities. The Guardian+1eman-network.com. Founded: 2011. Leader: Paul Golding. Ideology: Far-right nationalism, anti-Islam.

Racial Volunteer Force (RVF)

Activities: Involved in violent activities and dissemination of hate propaganda. Founded: 2002 Ideology: Neo-Nazism, white supremacy.

CPAC far right operations in the UK are highly sophisticated and span from heavily funded massmedia outlets, through infiltration of democratic institutions and subversions. The America-First CPAC organization coordinates with the UK Conservative party, its small populist fringe Pop-Cons, and the emerging ReformUK. These political organizations have been actively undermining International Treaties and International Law, in spreading false propaganda against U.N. Human Rights Chart, the European Convention of Human Rights , and the UK Human Rights ACT.1998(https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents) . The Massmedia propaganda operations are heavily financed by NewsCorp, american multinational characterised by an history of scandals and criminal activities. Other funding flows from UAE based Legatum Group, through the Legatum Institute, UK based organisation front propaganda institution for the Brexit Referendum and the spread of nationalism, and Anti-Europeanism extremist hatred propaganda. MassMedia outlet propaganda outlets funded by these organizations: GB News , TalkTv. These massmedia organisations act with complete impunity in spreading continuous extremist propaganda, conspiracy theory, disinformation, manipulation of public opinion, deliberate and intentional slander and disinformation about UK Institutions, Public Figures as Government Personell, the independence of the Judiciary branch of Democracy, and the independece of Institutions as the Bank of England.

These massmedia outlets operations, are more sophisticated and have similar patterns of Russia Disinformation factories, with continous propaganda and social media material by leveraging social media and streaming outlets as YouTube, which are indeed notorious for weak compliance in combatting misinformation, conspiracy theory, spred of false information, manipulation of public opinion, while being a cachoponic media outlet propaganda of extremist political parties as ReformUK and Conservative Party.

The Widespread CPAC (America First) network spans internationally here is a comprehensive list of extremist subversive organizations

Germany

Alternative for Germany (AfD). Founded: 2013. Ideology: Right-wing populism, nationalism Activities: Political party with increasing scrutiny; classified as a “right-wing extremist” organization by Germany’s domestic intelligence agency in 2025. AP News. Notoriously endorsed by Elon Musk, on X, while Tesla Factory in Germany implements stricts rules against Trade Unions and Workers Rights. Tesla founder publicly declared that AFD was unique in its plan of Remigration and Mass Deportations by targeting ethnic groups across Germany, with the Arian distinction that German people can be defined by birth and blood, hence all other ethnic groups and citizens have been under threath of mass deportation. AFD has been all the time a clear tentative of infiltrating the German State and Democratic Institutions to subvert the Constitutional order and repeal Internationl Treaties. Striking Examples of history are plain to understand, during the 1930s as also the NSPD managed to be elected, by voters suppression, violence, political assassinations, militarizations of the political entity, suppression of free-press, suppression of freedom of expression, targeting and mass suppression of ethnic groups on the basis of nationalist, white suprematist, criminal, extremist ideologies.

Remigration Europe Network as Ethnic Cleansing Infrastructure:

Core Definition: Remigration is “a far-right European concept of ethnic cleansing via the mass deportation or promoted voluntary return of non-white immigrants and their descendants, usually including those born in Europe, to their place of racial ancestry, often with no regard for their citizenship or legal status” Remigration – Wikipedia

Martin Sellner: Austrian neo-Nazi who popularized the term in the German-speaking world What is “remigration” and why is the German far right calling for it? – GZERO Media, author of “Remigration: A Proposal,” and recipient of funding from the Christchurch terrorist The ‘Far-Right Poster Boy’ that received Funds from the New Zealand Terrorist – Bridge Initiative

2023 Potsdam Meeting: Sellner presented mass deportation plans targeting “asylum seekers, foreigners with residence permits, and non-assimilated German citizens” to AfD and CDU members 2023 Potsdam far-right meeting – Wikipedia

Political Integration: Austria’s FPÖ “wants to ‘remigrate’ Austrian nationals with migrant roots to create a more ‘homogenous’ society” A surging far right cements its place in Europe

International Expansion: Trump’s mass deportation plans mirror Sellner’s blueprint, with Trump adopting the “remigration” terminology, showing transatlantic coordination GlobalextremismHuffPost

The concept of remigration has also influenced political discourse beyond Europe. In the United States, the Trump administration proposed the creation of an “Office of Remigration” within the State Department,and Farage echoing with the “Minister for Deportation” in massmedia propaganda, aiming to coordinate repatriation efforts. Critics argue that this move aligns with far-right European ideologies and normalizes racist policies, with the intent to provoke ethnic cleansing solutions, mass deportation and genocide. Wikipedia+5WIRED+5thedailybeast.com+5

EU Far-Right Movements Embracing Remigration

Several far-right parties and movements across Europe have adopted the concept of remigration:

Austria: The Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), led by Herbert Kickl, has campaigned on remigration policies, advocating for the deportation of immigrants who do not align with Austrian values. Financial Times+2Le Monde.fr+2The Guardian+2

Germany: The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party has publicly endorsed remigration, with leader Alice Weidel calling for the mass “return” of people with migrant backgrounds.

France: Groups like Sovereignty, Identity and Freedoms (SIEL) have advocated for remigration, aligning with identitarian ideologies. Wikipedia

Italy: The youth wing of the Lega party, Lega Giovani, has supported remigration following incidents involving migrants, receiving backing from regional leaders. Wikipedia

Sweden: The Alternative for Sweden (AfS) party promotes forced remigration of immigrants as part of its platform. Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

Operational Infrastructure:

“Remigration centers” in immigrant neighborhoods with €30-50,000 financial incentives for “voluntary” departure Remigration: The Identitarian Solution, by John Jackson – The Unz Review. Connection to the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory through Generation Identity network Factsheet: Martin Sellner – Bridge Initiative. Coordinated through identitarian movement conferences beginning about a decade ago in Paris How remigration became a buzzword for global far right.

This reveals that “Remigration Europe” is not a single organization but rather a coordinated ideological network systematically preparing for ethnic cleansing campaigns under the guise of immigration policy, with direct operational connections between European neo-Nazis, mainstream political parties, and American far-right movements. The network represents the bridge between electoral politics and explicit ethnic cleansing, demonstrating how the democratic facade serves to legitimize and prepare for systematic human rights violations.

ORS Group (Organisation for Refugee Services) is a Swiss-based multinational company specializing in immigration services across Europe. Established in Zurich in 1992, ORS operates in countries including Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy, Spain, and Greece. In 2022, it was acquired by the UK-based Serco Group, a prominent provider of government services .LinkedIn+6equistonepe.com+6Wikipedia+6equistonepe.com+5ORS Gruppe+5equistonepe.com+5.

Operations in Italy

In Italy, ORS operates through its subsidiary, ORS Italia S.r.l., based in Rome. The company manages several facilities, including:Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Serco+2. Italy: Centers for Repatriation (CPR) In Italy, ORS manages several CPRs, including those in Turin and Rome. A 2022 report by the Italian Coalition for Civil Liberties and Rights (CILD) highlighted issues at Rome CPR, such as:cild.eu+2Open Migration+2Il Dubbio+2. Closure of the female section, raising concerns about the detention of women in unsuitable facilities. cild.eu+6ilGiornale.it+6Academia+6Open Migrationcild.eu Limited inspections by health authorities. Penalties imposed on ORS for failing to provide necessities and maintain proper health documentation.

Centri di Permanenza per il Rimpatrio (CPR): CPR Brunelleschi in Turin, CPR Ponte Galeria in Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1.These centers are part of Italy’s infrastructure for hosting asylum seekers and managing repatriation processes .ORS Gruppe+1Serco+1

Controversies and Criticisms

ORS has faced scrutiny and criticism over its operations:

Austria: Traiskirchen Reception Center

In 2015, Amnesty International reported severe overcrowding at the Traiskirchen center, operated by ORS. Designed for 1,800 individuals, it housed over 4,600, leading to inhumane conditions such as insufficient food, lack of medical care, and inadequate shelter, with some refugees sleeping outdoors. Il Dubbio+2cild.eu+2Academia+2. In 2015, Amnesty International reported on overcrowded conditions at the Traiskirchen refugee center, which was managed by ORS .Wikipedia

Switzerland: A 2017 journalistic investigation highlighted issues at a reception center in Aesch, including collective punishments and food shortages .Wikipedia

Germany: Death of an Asylum Seeker

In 2023, Mamadou Diallo, an asylum seeker from Guinea, was found dead in his room at an ORS-managed facility in Berlin, weeks after his death. The incident led to the Berlin State Office for Refugees terminating contracts with ORS due to “serious defects” and “multiple structural problems.” InfoMigrants+1https://actualnewsmagazine.com+1

Spain. Head Office: Avenida Felipe II, 17, 1° oficina 1, 28009 MadridORS Gruppe+5ORS Gruppe+5ORS Gruppe+5. Operations: ORS España Servicios Sociales S.L. is in the development phase, focusing on provisioning and accommodation, social care, activities, and integration services.

Greece. Operations: ORS has established offices in Greece, aiming to provide immigration services, including accommodation and integration support. ORS Gruppe+1LinkedIn+1

France

Génération Identitaire (GI). Activities: Known for provocative stunts and anti-immigrant campaigns; dissolved by the French government in 2021 for inciting discrimination and hatred. Top10 Chronicle. Ideology: Identitarianism, anti-immigration

Comité du 9 Mai (C9M) – France

Overview

The Comité du 9 Mai (C9M) is an informal coalition of far-right, neo-fascist, and neo-Nazi groups in France. It was established in 1994 following the death of Sébastien Deyzieu, a 22-year-old nationalist activist who died while fleeing police during a banned demonstration in Paris. The group organizes annual commemorative marches in Paris, which have become significant events for far-right activists in France and across Europe.Wikipedia+9Wikipedia+9Wikipedia+9

Founding and Evolution

C9M was initially founded by: Groupe Union Défense (GUD), Front National de la Jeunesse (FNJ),Jeunesses Nationalistes Révolutionnaires (JNR)NurPhoto Agency+7democ+7Wikipedia+7Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

Over the years, the organization has seen involvement from various far-right groups, including: Bloc Identitaire, Social Bastion (Bastion Social), Zouaves Paris (ZVP) L’AlvariumWikipedia+4Wikipedia+4Wikipedia+4. As of 2023, C9M is led by Marc de Cacqueray-Valménier. Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1

Activities and Demonstrations

C9M organizes annual marches in Paris to commemorate Sébastien Deyzieu’s death. These events have seen varying levels of participation: In 2017, approximately 80 participants attended. By 2019, attendance grew to around 300. In 2023, the event attracted about 550 participants. The 2024 march saw over 600 attendees, with some reports estimating up to 850. In 2025, approximately 2,000 people participated, including delegations from Italy, Spain, Germany, and Hungary. Wikipedia+9democ+9Wikipedia+9WikipediaWikipedia

These gatherings often feature torchlit processions and are marked by nationalist and neo-fascist symbolism. They have sometimes been banned by authorities and are frequently met with counter-demonstrations by anti-fascist groups.democ+2

Spain

National Alliance (Alianza Nacional)

Founded: 2005, Ideology: Neo-Nazism, Spanish ultranationalism, Activities: Advocates for “Nation, Race, Socialism”; opposes immigration and regional separatism; involved in violent incidents. Southern Poverty Law Center+2Wikipedia+2HOPE not hate+2

Hacer Nación

Founded: 2020, Ideology: Neo-fascism, identitarianism, anti-immigration, Activities: Engages in activism, social actions, and propaganda; participated in local elections, securing two council seats. Wikipedia

Democracia Nacional

Founded: 1995, Ideology: Far-right nationalism, anti-Islam, Activities: Linked to former Nazi militants; involved in anti-Islam demonstrations and has faced legal proceedings for violent activities. HOPE not hate

España 2000

Founded: 2002, Ideology: Populist nationalism, Activities: Gained local council seats; known for anti-immigration rhetoric and opposition to Islam. Wikipedia+1HOPE not hate+1

Portugal

Chega

Founded: 2019, Leader: André Ventura, Ideology: Far-right nationalism, anti-immigration, Activities: Became the main opposition party in 2025 with 60 parliamentary seats; campaigns under the slogan “Save Portugal.” Wikipedia+5Financial Times+5AP News+5Southern Poverty Law Center+3Financial Times+3AP News+3AP News

New Social Order (Nova Ordem Social)

Activities: Organized marches commemorating former dictator Salazar; held nationalist conferences with international far-right participation. Wikipedia Ideology: Neo-Nazism, ultranationalism

Italy

Lega (Northern League)

Ideology: Right-wing populism, nationalism,Activities: Advocates for strict immigration controls and Euroscepticism; part of the ruling coalition government.Wikipedia, active parliamentarian taking part in organising Remigration Europe, through extremist far-right organizations Patriots for Europe.

CasaPound Italia (CPI)

Founded: 2008 in Rome. Ideology: Neo-fascism, Third Positionism, anti-immigration. Overview: CasaPound Italia (CPI) is an Italian neofascist accelerationist movement and militant organization founded in Rome in 2008. United fundamentally around a romanticization of Italy’s fascist past, CasaPound’s group identity centers on militancy, a glorification of violence, and violent confrontation. euronews+2AP News+2middlebury.edu+2middlebury.edu

Forza Nuova (FN)

Founded: 1997 by Roberto Fiore and Massimo Morsello, Ideology: Neo-fascism, ultranationalism, anti-immigration, anti-LGBTQ+. Overview: Forza Nuova (New Force) is an Italian far-right political party. The party’s ideology is ultra-nationalist, conservative, and neofascist. Wikipedia+1The Times+1Counter Extremism Project+1Wikipedia+1

Do.Ra. (Comunità Militante dei Dodici Raggi)

Founded: 2011. Ideology: Neo-fascism, pagan nationalism. Overview: Do.Ra. is a militant group operating primarily in Lombardy, Italy. It espouses neo-fascist and pagan nationalist ideologies, organizing events and demonstrations that glorify Italy’s fascist past.

Poland

National-Radical Camp (Obóz Narodowo-Radykalny – ONR)

Founded: 1934 (revived in the 1990s). Ideology: Neo-fascism, antisemitism, ultranationalism. Activities: ONR is known for its antisemitic rhetoric and has been described as “the very symbol of fascism in Poland.” The Guardian+3Wikipedia+3AP News+3Southern Poverty Law Center

National Revival of Poland (Narodowe Odrodzenie Polski – NOP)

Founded: 1981, Ideology: Neo-fascism, nationalism, anti-communism, Activities: NOP has been involved in nationalist demonstrations and has connections to other far-right groups in Europe. Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1Deutsche Welle

March of Independence Guard (Straż Marszu Niepodległości – SMN)

Activities: SMN is a paramilitary organization providing security for the annual Independence Day marches in Poland. Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1Untergrund-Blättle+1Wikipedia+1. Ideology: Ultranationalism, paramilitarism

Romania

Noua Dreaptă (New Right)

Founded: 2000 (as NGO), 2015 (as political party),Ideology: Neo-Legionarism, ultranationalism, Christian fundamentalism, Activities: Noua Dreaptă claims to be the successor of the Iron Guard and is known for its anti-LGBTQ+, anti-immigration, and anti-globalist stances. Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2HOPE not hate+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2

Greater Romania Party (Partidul România Mare – PRM)

Founded: 1991, Ideology: Ultranationalism, populism, Activities: PRM has been known for its strong opposition to ethnic minorities and has published nationalist literature. HOPE not hate

Alliance for the Union of Romanians (Alianța pentru Unirea Românilor – AUR)

Activities: AUR has gained significant political traction, promoting nationalist and conservative values. AP News+10Wikipedia+10Wikipedia+10. Ideology: Ultranationalism, conservatism

Slovakia

People’s Party Our Slovakia (Ľudová strana Naše Slovensko – ĽSNS)

Founded: 2010, Ideology: Neo-Nazism, ultranationalism, Activities: ĽSNS is known for its anti-Roma rhetoric and has been involved in various nationalist activities.

Republic Movement (Hnutie Republika)

Founded: 2021, Ideology: Neo-fascism, national conservatism, Activities: Formed by former members of ĽSNS, the Republic Movement continues to promote far-right ideologies. Wikipedia

Serbia

Leviathan Movement

Founded: Date unspecified, Ideology: Ultranationalism, neo-Nazism

Activities: Leviathan is known for its animal rights activism, which critics argue is a front for far-right activities. Wikipedia+6The Guardian+6Southern Poverty Law Center+6Antifascist Europe

Serbian Right (Srpska Desnica)

Founded: Date unspecified, Ideology: Ultranationalism, traditionalism, Activities: The group advocates for traditional values and has been involved in nationalist demonstrations. Wikipedia+2The Guardian+2Southern Poverty Law Center+2

Dveri Movement

Founded: Date unspecified, Ideology: Clerical nationalism, Activities: Dveri promotes the establishment of a “class monarchy” and a symphony of state and church. WikipediaAntifascist Europe

How Democratic Institutions and civil society in Europe and United States have to ban extremist organization and preserve Democracy and civil rights

Democratic resilience building through civic education and institutional strengthening. Economic inequality mitigation to address underlying conditions exploited by extremist recruiters.

Media literacy initiatives to combat disinformation and conspiracy theories. Community-based prevention programs leveraging local organizations and former extremists.

Acknowledging in public discourse the Dangers of Extremist Neo-Fascist Neo-Nazist organizations and their wider network

The far-right extremist threat to democratic institutions represents a clear and present danger requiring coordinated international response. These groups’ systematic targeting of trade unions, academic institutions, electoral processes, and civil society organizations demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of democratic vulnerabilities. Their transnational networks, increasing operational sophistication, and sustained pattern of violence indicate an escalating threat that demands immediate and comprehensive countermeasures to preserve democratic governance and pluralistic societies.

Critical to understanding this threat is recognizing these movements’ fundamental rejection of the post-WWII international legal order. By systematically undermining the Nuremberg Principles, UN frameworks, Rome Statute, human rights treaties, and the ECHR, these groups seek to dismantle the legal foundations that have prevented the return of fascist governance and ethnic conflict in Europe and beyond. Their coordinated assault on international law represents an existential challenge not only to individual democratic states but to the entire architecture of international peace, security, and human rights protection established after World War II.

The convergence of anti-democratic ideologies, paramilitary structures, coordinated subversion campaigns, and systematic international law rejection across multiple nations suggests these movements pose an unprecedented challenge to the liberal democratic order that requires extraordinary levels of international cooperation, legal innovation, and domestic resilience-building to effectively counter. Failure to address this threat comprehensively risks the collapse of both democratic governance and the international legal frameworks that have maintained relative peace and stability for nearly eight decades.

---

Assessment based on open-source intelligence, government reports, and academic research