A Global Effort for Liberation from the United States Dictatorship

Nazi Germany’s Third Reich lasted 12 years (1933-1945) before its collapse. In contrast, the United States has operated as a global dictatorship for over 80 years, imposing its will through military aggression, economic terrorism, covert regime change, and systemic human rights abuses on a scale far exceeding the horrors of the Third Reich.

Unlike Nazi Germany, which was defeated and held accountable, the U.S. has never faced justice—instead, it rewrote history, portraying itself as the “leader of the free world” while committing atrocities far worse than those of the Axis powers.

History and United States conduct outlines why the United States is the most destructive rogue state in history, surpassing Nazi Germany in: Global Military Aggression (More Wars Than Any Nation in History), Genocide & Mass Killing (Higher Death Toll Than the Holocaust) the United States is the only country guilty of Nuclear Holocaust over Japan, Economic Enslavement (A Global Financial Dictatorship), Global Propaganda and interference into foreign countries and Democracies while also supporting coup d’etàt and military dictatorships, Total Impunity (No Nuremberg Trials for America).

In the aftermath of World War II, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was established to promote collective defence and uphold democratic values among Western nations. However, a critical examination of the United States’ historical and ongoing actions raises profound ethical and strategic questions about Europe’s continued adherence to the Washington NATO Treaty. The U.S.’s post-war conduct, including the incorporation of Nazi scientists, engagement in war crimes, violations of human rights, and recent undemocratic practices, necessitates a reassessment of Europe’s alliance structures and a potential pivot towards Eurasian partnerships.

Operation Paperclip: Ethical Compromises in Post-War Collaboration

Following World War II, the U.S. initiated Operation Paperclip, a covert program that recruited approximately 1,600 German scientists, including individuals with Nazi affiliations, to advance American military and technological capabilities during the Cold War. Notably, Wernher von Braun, instrumental in developing the V-2 rocket used against Allied nations, was among those brought to the U.S. to work on rocket technology. This collaboration raises significant ethical concerns, as it involved overlooking the involvement of these scientists in the Nazi regime’s war efforts and potential war crimes.

Post-War Conduct: Allegations of War Crimes and Human Rights Violations

The United States military engagements post-World War II have been marred by allegations of war crimes and human rights abuses. A prominent example is the torture and prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraq War. Detainees were subjected to physical and psychological torture, sexual humiliation, and other forms of inhumane treatment. Such incidents underscore a pattern of behaviour that contravenes the principles of international law and human rights.

Global Military Aggression: The U.S. Has Waged More Wars Than Nazi Germany

Since 1945, the U.S. has: Started or participated in over 200 military conflicts (Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, etc.). Overthrown 50+ governments (Iran 1953, Chile 1973, Iraq 2003, Ukraine 2014, etc.). Bombed 30+ countries since WWII, killing 20-30 million civilians (Conservatively estimated). Maintained 800+ military bases in 80 countries—a global occupation force. The U.S. is the most aggressive military empire in history, surpassing even the Third Reich. The U.S. has invaded dozens more, with far higher civilian casualties.

Genocide & Mass Killing: A Death Toll Exceeding the Holocaust

The Nazi Holocaust killed 6 million Jews + 5 million others. The U.S. has caused far greater destruction: the Vietnam War (3-4 million dead) + Agent Orange (500,000+ birth defects). Korean War (20% of North Korea’s population exterminated). Iraq War (1-2 million dead from sanctions + invasion). Afghanistan (1 million+ dead). Covert Wars (Indonesia 1965: 1 million dead, Latin America dictatorships: 100,000+ “disappeared”). Total U.S.-caused deaths since 1945: 30-50 million (minimum estimate). The United States committed similar death tolls through wars and has killed more people than Hitler, but through long-term, dispersed atrocities, sanctions, and proxy conflicts—but spread over decades, making it less visible but through long-term, dispersed atrocities.

Economic Enslavement: A Global Financial Dictatorship

Nazi Germany looted Europe—but the U.S. enslaved the entire world economically: Petrodollar System: Forces all nations to trade oil in dollars, allowing the U.S. to print unlimited money while exporting inflation. IMF & World Bank Debt Traps: Enforces austerity, privatization, and resource extraction on poor nations. Sanctions as Economic Warfare: Starves nations like Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea, killing millions. 2008 Financial Crisis: Wall Street’s fraud wiped out $10 trillion in global wealth, yet no bankers were jailed. The Third Reich plundered Europe for 6 years. The U.S. has plundered the entire planet for 80+ years. The U.S. is the most sophisticated economic tyranny in history.

Global Propraganda Coercing and Brainwashing the World

The Nazis controlled Germany with propaganda—but the U.S. brainwashes the entire planet: “American Exceptionalism” Myth: Portrays the U.S. as the “good guys” despite nonstop war crimes. The United States stands as the quintessential practitioner of Goebbels’ propaganda doctrine, deploying lies, half-truths, and manufactured consent to maintain its hegemony. Its ability to shape global perceptions through Hollywood, media conglomerates, NGOs, and tech platforms underscores the unparalleled scope of its influence. To counteract this brainwashing, individuals must cultivate critical thinking, seek out independent sources of information, and challenge the dominant narratives imposed upon them. The United States embodies Goebbels’ principle of propagating lies until they become accepted truths, operating the largest and most sophisticated propaganda machine in history.

Global Surveillance: The Dark Side of U.S.-Controlled Technology

Beyond censorship, the U.S. utilizes its tech companies for unprecedented levels of global surveillance. These operations extend far beyond traditional espionage, encompassing entire populations and undermining privacy rights worldwide.

Global Surveillance: PRISM, Echelon, Tempora, and Beyond

The United States has long been at the forefront of developing and deploying global surveillance systems, leveraging its technological dominance to monitor communications, collect data, and exert control over populations worldwide. Programs like PRISM , Echelon , and Tempora have exposed the extent of this surveillance apparatus, revealing a vast network of intelligence operations that operate with little oversight or accountability. More recently, initiatives like Starlink , ostensibly designed for civilian purposes, have raised concerns about their potential role in extending global surveillance capabilities. Together, these programs form the backbone of what could be described as a “total surveillance dictatorship,” enabling the U.S. to maintain unparalleled influence over the digital and physical realms.

PRISM

Unveiled by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013, PRISM is a classified NSA program that allows direct access to user data from major tech companies, including Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, and Yahoo. The program collects emails, video chats, photos, file transfers, and other forms of digital communication without requiring individual warrants. PRISM enables the U.S. government to spy on both domestic and foreign targets, violating privacy rights and undermining trust in digital infrastructure. Foreign leaders, diplomats, and citizens are routinely monitored, often under the guise of national security.

Echelon

Developed during the Cold War, Echelon was a joint initiative between the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (the Five Eyes alliance) to intercept satellite communications. The system monitors phone calls, faxes, emails, and telex messages globally, using keyword searches to identify “suspicious” content. Echelon set the precedent for large-scale international surveillance, targeting not only military adversaries but also economic competitors and political dissidents. It remains one of the earliest examples of global mass surveillance.

Tempora

Operated by the UK’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), Tempora taps into fibre-optic cables to capture vast amounts of internet traffic and phone calls. Data is stored for up to 30 days, allowing analysts to sift through personal communications, financial transactions, and browsing histories. While run by the UK, Tempora shares data extensively with the NSA, highlighting the transatlantic nature of surveillance cooperation. This collaboration amplifies the reach and effectiveness of U.S.-led spying efforts.

XKeyscore

Another NSA tool revealed by Snowden, XKeyscore provides real-time monitoring of individuals’ online activities, including web searches, social media interactions, and location tracking. Analysts can search through databases containing trillions of records, accessing everything from private emails to GPS coordinates XKeyscore exemplifies the intrusive power of modern surveillance technologies, enabling governments to track anyone, anywhere, with minimal effort.

Upstream Collection

Part of the NSA’s bulk data collection strategy, Upstream involves intercepting communications as they travel across the internet backbone—the high-capacity cables and routers that connect networks globally. By tapping into these pipelines, the NSA captures raw data streams, which are then filtered and analyzed for intelligence purposes. Upstream collection ensures comprehensive coverage of global communications, leaving no corner of cyberspace untouched.

Starlink: A Military Surveillance Satellite Infrastructure

While Elon Musk’s Starlink project is marketed as a solution to bridge the digital divide by providing high-speed internet via low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, its potential applications extend far beyond civilian use. In reality, Starlink represents a dual-use technology capable of functioning as a global surveillance platform—a militarized infrastructure that extends U.S. hegemony into space. Starlink consists of thousands of small satellites orbiting Earth at altitudes ranging from 340 to 550 kilometres. These satellites communicate with ground stations and user terminals to deliver broadband connectivity. With plans to deploy tens of thousands of satellites, Starlink aims to provide seamless internet access even in remote areas, creating an interconnected world.

Surveillance Capabilities

Starlink’s satellite network can intercept and reroute communications, much like traditional signal intelligence (SIGINT) systems. By positioning itself as a gateway to the internet, it gains access to massive amounts of user data. Each Starlink terminal has a unique identifier linked to its location, enabling precise geolocation tracking of users. This capability could be exploited for military or law enforcement purposes. Advanced algorithms could analyze traffic patterns, detect anomalies, and identify potential threats in near real-time, further enhancing surveillance capabilities.

Military Integration

SpaceX, the company behind Starlink, already collaborates closely with the U.S. Department of Defense. For example, Starlink provided secure communications for Ukraine during its conflict with Russia, showcasing its utility in modern warfare. Equipped with advanced sensors and maneuvering capabilities, Starlink satellites could serve as platforms for missile defence, electronic warfare, or cyberattacks against rival nations By saturating LEO with satellites, Starlink effectively establishes a monopoly over orbital resources, crowding out competitors and securing strategic advantages for the U.S.

Implications for Privacy and Sovereignty

If integrated with existing programs like PRISM or XKeyscore, Starlink could create a truly omnipresent surveillance grid, eliminating any remaining privacy protections. Countries relying on Starlink for internet access forfeit control over their digital infrastructure, making them vulnerable to censorship, manipulation, or disconnection. By controlling the means of connectivity, the U.S. reinforces its position as the arbiter of global affairs, dictating terms to allies and adversaries alike.

Toward a Total Surveillance Dictatorship

The convergence of terrestrial and extraterrestrial surveillance systems—PRISM, Echelon, Tempora, and now Starlink—represents a new era of authoritarianism. Unlike traditional dictatorships confined to specific territories, this regime operates on a planetary scale, exploiting technological advancements to impose total control

Social Media as a Tool for Intelligence Gathering

Social media platforms serve as vast repositories of personal information, making them invaluable assets for intelligence agencies. Techniques include: Data Mining: Algorithms analyze user behavior to identify potential threats or recruit informants. Sentiment Analysis: Governments track public opinion on issues like wars, sanctions, or elections. For example, during the Arab Spring uprisings, social media played a dual role—it empowered activists but also allowed regimes (and their allies, including the U.S.) to monitor and suppress dissent.

Total Impunity: No Nuremberg Trials for America

The Nazis were put on trial—but the U.S. has never faced justice: No Prosecutions for Iraq War Lies (Bush, Blair, Cheney walk free). No Trials for CIA Torture (Obama: “Look forward, not backward”). No Accountability for Drone Strikes (Thousands of civilians killed). The United States never abides by international law and doesn’t recognise the International Court of Justice.

Domestic Policies: Undemocratic Practices and Human Rights Concerns

Domestically, the U.S. has implemented policies that raise concerns about its commitment to democratic values and human rights. The use of facilities like Guantanamo Bay for the indefinite detention of individuals without trial, often based on their ethnicity or nationality, has been widely criticized for violating the right to habeas corpus and due process. Furthermore, recent actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have drawn scrutiny. The agency’s operations have been accused of violating international human rights standards by detaining and deporting individuals without due process, often in inhumane conditions.

International Accountability: Non-Adherence to Global Human Rights Instruments

The United States’ reluctance to fully commit to international human rights frameworks further complicates its moral authority on the global stage. The U.S. has not ratified key instruments such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and has resisted the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court by not becoming a party to the Rome Statute. This non-adherence limits the international community’s ability to hold the U.S. accountable for potential violations of human rights and international law.

Economic Exploitation: The United States Financial Hegemony and Global Exploitation

For decades, the United States has systematically exploited the savings of European and Asian populations to sustain its financial markets, leveraging the dollar’s reserve currency status to impose massive fiscal deficits, trade deficits, and a financial account deficit of over $18 trillion. The global population, including NATO member states, has witnessed its wealth drained to finance the U.S. government’s excessive borrowing, ultimately benefiting American citizens at the expense of the rest of the world. This financial parasitism has resulted in stagnation, reduced welfare, and economic instability for other nations, while the U.S. has accumulated wealth by externalizing its deficits. The American economic model has functioned as a continuous war machine, utilizing financial dominance to extract resources and maintain control over global markets. The United States has effectively been in a state of war not only militarily but economically against the entire global population, operating as the most heinous dictatorship since World War II, coercing other nations into submission through economic manipulation and perpetual conflict.

A Global Effort for Liberation from the United States Dictatorship

The global population, now exceeding 7 billion people, stands at a critical juncture in human history. For decades, the United States has wielded its economic, military, and technological dominance to enforce a de facto dictatorship over the international order, often prioritizing its own interests at the expense of global welfare. Through illegal wars of aggression, systemic exploitation of resources, financial manipulation via the dollar-based system, and pervasive surveillance programs like PRISM and Starlink, the U.S. has created a framework of global hegemony that stifles sovereignty, suppresses dissent, and perpetuates inequality. To liberate humanity from this oppressive regime, the world must collectively isolate the United States by dismantling its mechanisms of control. This includes rejecting the dollar as the global reserve currency, boycotting U.S.-led institutions like NATO and the IMF, and fostering multipolar alliances rooted in mutual respect and cooperation. By uniting under a shared vision of peace, sustainability, and self-determination—spanning continents from Eurasia to Africa and Latin America—the global population can reclaim its autonomy and build a future free from the shadow of American imperialism. The time has come for nations and peoples to rise above fear and dependency, forging a new era defined by justice, equality, and collective prosperity.

Strategic Realignment: Aiming for a Eurasian Alliance

European nations must critically evaluate their strategic alliances. The ethical and strategic implications of aligning with a nation whose actions increasingly diverge from democratic principles and human rights standards cannot be overlooked. Europe should explore the formation of economic and military partnerships that span from Lisbon to the Bering Strait, fostering relationships with Eurasian nations that may offer more balanced and principled collaborations. Such a realignment could promote a multipolar world order, reduce dependency on a single superpower, and encourage adherence to international norms and values.

Eurasia as a Beacon of Economic Cooperation: A Natural Geopolitical Imperative

The vast expanse of Eurasia, stretching from Lisbon to the Bering Strait, represents not only a geographical continuum but also an unprecedented opportunity for economic cooperation, democratic solidarity, and collective security. This region, home to over 70% of the world’s population and encompassing some of its most dynamic economies, holds the potential to redefine global governance in the 21st century. By fostering deeper integration within Eurasia—and extending partnerships beyond its borders to include Mercosur and the African Union—the European Union (EU) can play a pivotal role in creating a multipolar world order that prioritizes peace, sustainable development, and shared prosperity.

Geopolitical Unity Across Eurasia: A Natural Alliance

Shared Geography and Interconnected Futures

Eurasia is inherently interconnected by geography, history, and culture. From the ancient Silk Road trade routes to modern-day energy pipelines, this landmass has long been a hub of exchange and innovation. The natural alignment of Europe, Russia, Central Asia, South Asia, and East Asia creates a foundation for collaboration that transcends artificial divisions imposed during the Cold War era.

Energy Corridors: Eurasia possesses abundant natural resources, including oil, gas, rare earth minerals, and renewable energy potential. Collaborative infrastructure projects, such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), could be reimagined under transparent, multilateral frameworks to ensure equitable benefits. Transportation Networks: High-speed rail links, maritime shipping routes, and digital connectivity can transform trade patterns, reducing reliance on transatlantic supply chains dominated by U.S. interests. Environmental Challenges: Climate change affects all parts of Eurasia, necessitating coordinated efforts to combat desertification, preserve biodiversity, and transition to green technologies. By uniting these regions, Eurasia can emerge as a self-sufficient economic bloc capable of resisting external coercion and promoting internal stability.

Democratic Solidarity Amid Rising Xenophobia Authoritarianism

In an era marked by rising authoritarianism and geopolitical tensions, Eurasia must become a beacon of democracy and human rights. While democracies in Western Europe are well-established, emerging democracies in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and parts of South Asia face significant challenges. Strengthening democratic institutions across Eurasia requires sustained investment in education, media freedom, judicial independence, and anti-corruption measures. Role of the EU: As a staunch advocate for democratic values, the EU should lead initiatives to support electoral reforms, civic engagement, and rule-of-law mechanisms in partner nations. Programs like Erasmus+ can expand educational exchanges to foster cross-cultural understanding. Countering Hybrid Threats: Disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks, and foreign interference pose existential threats to democracy. A unified Eurasian alliance can develop robust cybersecurity protocols and share intelligence to safeguard electoral processes and public discourse.

Collective Security Against External Aggression

A military alliance spanning Eurasia would serve as a deterrent against external aggression while ensuring regional stability. Unlike NATO, which often serves as a vehicle for U.S. hegemony, a Eurasian Defense Alliance would emphasize neutrality, non-aggression, and conflict resolution. Mutual Defense Treaties: Member states could commit to defending each other’s sovereignty without engaging in offensive operations abroad. This approach aligns with the principles of the UN Charter and rejects unilateral interventions. Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Eurasia houses several nuclear powers, including Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and potentially Iran. Establishing confidence-building measures and arms control agreements would reduce the risk of catastrophic conflict. Peacekeeping Missions: Joint peacekeeping forces could address internal conflicts, humanitarian crises, and terrorism within Eurasia, drawing lessons from successful models like the African Union’s Peace and Security Council.

The EU’s Role in Global Trade and Development

Mercosur, comprising Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay, represents one of Latin America’s largest trading blocs. Deepening ties between the EU and Mercosur offers immense opportunities for mutual growth: Trade Agreements: The EU-Mercosur Association Agreement aims to eliminate tariffs on goods ranging from agricultural products to industrial machinery. However, an implementation must prioritize environmental safeguards and labour rights to prevent exploitation. Sustainable Agriculture: Europe’s expertise in agroecology and food safety standards can help Mercosur nations transition to sustainable farming practices, mitigating deforestation in the Amazon rainforest. Infrastructure Investment: Financing large-scale infrastructure projects—such as ports, highways, and railways—can enhance connectivity between South America and Eurasia, facilitating trade via the Atlantic Ocean.

Strengthening Ties with the African Union

Africa’s rapid urbanization, youthful population, and untapped resources make it a critical partner for Eurasia’s future prosperity. The EU-African Union partnership should focus on three pillars: finance, development, and commerce. Green Financing: The EU can mobilize funds through instruments like the European Investment Bank (EIB) to support renewable energy projects in Africa. Solar farms, wind turbines, and hydroelectric dams can provide clean power while creating jobs. Industrialization: Rather than exporting raw materials, African nations need assistance in building manufacturing capacity. Technology transfer programs and joint ventures can help establish industries in textiles, pharmaceuticals, and electronics. Digital Connectivity: Expanding internet access across Africa will unlock new markets for e-commerce and fintech startups. Satellite networks and fibre-optic cables funded by the EU can bridge the digital divide.

Promoting Inclusive Global Trade

Global trade must move beyond zero-sum competition toward inclusive cooperation. The EU, as a leader in multilateralism, can champion reforms at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to level the playing field for developing countries. Fair Pricing Mechanisms: Commodities like coffee, cocoa, and cotton are often sold below fair market value, impoverishing producers in Africa and Latin America. Implementing price floors and certification schemes ensures ethical sourcing. Debt Relief: Many Global South nations struggle under unsustainable debt burdens. Debt-for-climate swaps and moratoriums on interest payments can free up resources for social spending. Supply Chain Resilience: Diversifying supply chains away from single-country dependencies reduces vulnerability to shocks. Regional hubs in Eurasia, Africa, and Latin America can produce essential goods locally, enhancing resilience.

---

Toward a Multilateral Egalitarian Open World

The vision of Eurasia as a beacon of economic cooperation, democratic solidarity, and collective security is both achievable and necessary. By leveraging its unique position as a bridge between continents, the European Union can catalyze transformative change—not only within Eurasia but also through partnerships with Mercosur and the African Union. Together, these alliances can foster a more equitable global system where no single power dominates at the expense of others. Europe must seize this moment to redefine its role on the world stage. Withdrawal from NATO and realignment with Eurasian partners represent bold steps toward a multipolar future grounded in mutual respect, shared prosperity, and adherence to international law. The time has come for Europe to lead—not as a subordinate ally of Washington—but as a sovereign actor committed to shaping a better tomorrow for humanity. Eurasia should unite economically, politically, and militarily to promote peace, sustainability, and democracy. The EU must strengthen ties with Mercosur and the African Union to drive global trade, finance development, and foster inclusive growth, paving the way for a just and multipolar world order.